Interday learning cards are now counted in the learning count again,
and are no longer subject to the daily review limit.
The thinking behind the original change was that interday learning cards
are scheduled more like reviews, and counting them in the review count
would allow the learning count to focus on intraday learning - the red
number reflecting the fact that they are the most fragile memories. And
counting them together made it practical to apply the review limit
to both at once.
Since the release, there have been a number of users expecting to see
interday learning cards included in the learning count (the latest being
https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/feedback-and-a-feature-adjustment-request-for-2-1-45/12308),
and a good argument can be made for that too - they are, after all, listed
in the learning steps, and do tend to be harder than reviews. Short of
introducing another count to keep track of interday and intraday learning
separately, moving back to the old behaviour seems like the best move.
This also means it is not really practical to apply the review limit to
interday learning cards anymore, as the limit would be split between two
different numbers, and how much each number is capped would depend on
the order cards are introduced. The scheduler could figure this out, but
the deck list code does not know card order, and would need significant
changes to be able to produce numbers that matched the scheduler. And
even if we ignore implementation complexities, I think it would be more
difficult for users to reason about - the influence of the review limit
on new cards is confusing enough as it is.
This makes the review backlog case more expensive, since we end up
shuffling items outside the daily limit, but for the common case it's
about the same speed, and it means we don't need two separate sorting
steps. New cards remain handled the same way, since a backlog
is common there.
Also ensures that interday learning cards honor the deck sorting, and
that the non-default sort orders shuffle at the end.
- Daily limits are no longer inherited - each deck limits its own
cards, and the selected deck enforces a maximum limit.
- Fetching of review cards now uses a single query, and sorts in advance.
In collections with a large number of overdue cards and decks, this is
faster than iterating over each deck in turn.
- Include interday learning count in review count & review limit, and
allow them to be buried.
- Warn when parent review limit is lower than child deck in deck options.
- Cap the new card limit to the review limit.
- Add option to control whether new card fetching short-circuits.
- split new card fetch order and subsequent sort order; use latter
when building queues
- default to spacing siblings when burying is off, with options to
show each sibling in turn, and shuffle the fetched cards
The bury new/review flags are now pulled from each card's home deck,
instead of using a global setting that had not been hooked up. This
unfortunately means we need to fetch the map of all decks up front, as
we need to be able to look up a deck configuration for cards that are
in filtered decks.
Fixes a "card was modified" error caused by cards being buried during
review, when they weren't removed up-front.
So, this is fun. Apparently "DeckId" is considered preferable to the
"DeckID" were were using until now, and the latest clippy will start
warning about it. We could of course disable the warning, but probably
better to bite the bullet and switch to the naming that's generally
considered best.
Instead of generating a fluent.proto file with a giant enum, create
a .json file representing the translations that downstream consumers
can use for code generation.
This enables the generation of a separate method for each translation,
with a docstring that shows the actual text, and any required arguments
listed in the function signature.
The codebase is still using the old enum for now; updating it will need
to come in future commits, and the old enum will need to be kept
around, as add-ons are referencing it.
Other changes:
- move translation code into a separate crate
- store the translations on a per-file/module basis, which will allow
us to avoid sending 1000+ strings on each JS page load in the future
- drop the undocumented support for external .ftl files, that we weren't
using
- duplicate strings in translation files are now checked for at build
time
- fix i18n test failing when run outside Bazel
- drop slog dependency in i18n module
We were (ab)using the bulk update routine to do deletions, but that
code was really intended to be used for finding&replacing, where an
exact match is not a requirement.
- fetch sfld and csum when fetching notes, to make it cheaper
to write them back out unmodified
- make `fields` private, and access it via accessors, so we can
still catch when fields have been mutated without calling
prepare_for_update()
- fix python importing code passing a string in as the checksum
The USN is still set, which should cause the cards to sync in the
non-conflict case, but if changes have been made on other devices
the ease fix will not take priority, as we could be overwriting the
reviews of someone who has not synced in a while.
Closes#766
- changes the on-disk representation from % to a multiplier,
eg 250 -> 2.5, as this is consistent with the other options
- resets deck configs at or below 1.3 to 2.5
- for any cards that were using a reset deck config, reset their
current factor if it's at or below 2.0x. The cutoff is arbitrary,
and just intended to make sure we catch cards the user has rated
Easy on multiple times. The existing due dates are left alone.
Saves having to serialize the note fields and q/a templates, which
is particularly a win when rendering question/answer in the browse
screen.
Also some work towards being able to preview notes without having to
commit them to the database.
- notes with wrong field count are now recovered instead of
being deleted
- notes with missing note types are now recovered
- notes with missing cards are now recovered
- recover_missing_deck() still needs implementing
- checks required
Some third party clients that create apkg files appear to be saving
a millisecond timestamp into this column. While this could also be
solved by increasing this field to a 64 bit number, some older clients
expect this column to be a 32 bit number.
