This uses exactly the same code, with one exception. In the previewer
`self` became `self.parent` in order to have action on the
browser. And in the browser, some `self` become `self.previewer` to
access the previewer. (Some function having an action on the previewer
starting from the browser now are separated in two. One version in the
previewer doing the same thing. One version in the browser, calling
the version in the previewer if it exists.)
Preview dialog now takes a QWidget in general, not necesarrily a
Browser. The parameter is called parent
The progress handling code needs a rethink, as we now have two separate
ways to flag that the media sync should abort. In the future, it may
make sense to switch to polling the backend for progress, instead of
passing a callback in.
This reverts commit 9e6a2ba1e6, reversing
changes made to fc846ac4e4.
Causes a traceback when opening the add screen, clicking on Type,
and choosing a note type.
File "/Users/dae/Work/code/dtop/qt/aqt/webview.py", line 31, in cmd
return json.dumps(self.onCmd(str))
File "/Users/dae/Work/code/dtop/qt/aqt/webview.py", line 97, in _onCmd
return self._onBridgeCmd(str)
File "/Users/dae/Work/code/dtop/qt/aqt/webview.py", line 500, in _onBridgeCmd
return self.onBridgeCmd(cmd)
File "/Users/dae/Work/code/dtop/qt/aqt/editor.py", line 374, in onBridgeCmd
self._links[cmd](self, *args) # type: ignore
File "/Users/dae/Work/code/dtop/qt/aqt/editor.py", line 404, in onBlur
if gui_hooks.editor_did_unfocus_field(False, self.note, int(ord)):
TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'NoneType'
Initially, I wanted to solve the bug reported on
https://github.com/Arthur-Milchior/anki-html-src-in-field/issues/1
After some research, I finally discovered that the trouble was that,
when we change the note type in add card, the method
`aqt.editor.Editor.loadNote` is called twice. In itself, it would not
be a problem, but given the way callback works, its call back is
called twice on the last version of the webview. Which means that
`gui_hooks.editor_did_load_note` is called twice, which breaks this
add-on.
The reason why loadNote is called twice is because `setNote` is called
twice in `aqt.modelchooser.onModelChange`. The first time through
`gui_hooks.current_note_type_did_change` which calls
`addcards.AddCards.onModelChange` which calls `loadNote`, the second
time through `self.mw.reset()` which calls
`gui_hooks.state_did_reset()` which calls `addcards.AddCards.onReset`
which calls `setAndFocusNote` which calls `setNote`.
I should note furthermore that currently,
`gui_hooks.current_note_type_did_change` is called only when the model
chooser change a model. And `addCards.onModelChange` is never called,
only added to the hook `gui_hooks.current_note_type_did_change`. So
removing the line of code removed in this commit will have no side
effect in Anki itself. It will only affect the fact that this method
is called twice.
I do not know of any add-on calling `onModelChange` or
`gui_hooks.current_note_type_did_change`, but it means little, so of
course, it may always mean an add-on will break because of this
change. No way of being sure.
The reason to do that is that I can then call blur/key from other
method in add-on.
More precisely, I expect to create a method which captures the blur
command, ask anki to execute the standard version of the command, and
then execute more code once the note contains the new field value.
I should note that the code executed during blur/key/focus itself
didn't change. It's only it's location which changed.
A current problem I have is that there is nothing similar to hook
inside of javascript. It seems that it would be easier to be able to
add other methods in javascript and call them in loadNote. Currently I
simply redefined loadNote, which is far from perfect
Sometime I like to print html to understand why it bugs. And I really
prefer to have html indented if it's okay with you. There is no change
appart from the identation and quotes
This code was an awful hack to provide some semblance of UI
responsiveness while executing DB statements on the main thread.
Instead, we can just run DB statements in a background thread now,
keeping the UI responsive.
We were previously relying on the DB progress hook to cause the
progress window to display.
Qt's progress dialogs do have built in support for automatically
showing, but it's easier to add a timer than change the existing
code to use it.
