* Add CardAdder test helper
* Add option to have new cards ignore the review limit
Also entails a lot of refactoring because the old code was deeply
coupled to the previous behaviour.
* Add global option to ignore review limit
* Refactor decrementation
* Unify testing
* Run cargo +nightly fmt
* Latest prost-build includes clippy workaround
* Tweak Rust protobuf imports
- Avoid use of stringify!(), as JetBrains editors get confused by it
- Stop merging all protobuf symbols into a single namespace
* Remove some unnecessary qualifications
Found via IntelliJ lint
* Migrate some asserts to assert_eq/ne
* Remove mention of node_modules exclusion
This no longer seems to be necessary after migrating away from Bazel,
and excluding it means TS/Svelte files can't be edited properly.
Ideally this would have been in beta 6 :-) No add-ons appear to be
using customstudy.py/taglimit.py though, so it should hopefully not be
disruptive.
In the earlier custom study changes, we didn't get around to addressing
issue #1136. Now instead of trying to determine the maximum increase
to allow (which doesn't work correctly with nested decks), we just
present the total available to the user again, and let them decide. There's
plenty of room for improvement here still, but further work here might
be better done once we look into decoupling deck limits from deck presets.
Tags and available cards are fetched prior to showing the dialog now,
and will show a progress dialog if things take a while.
Tags are stored in an aux var now, so they don't inflate the deck
object size.
* avoid repinning Rust deps by default
* add id_tree dependency
* Respect intermediate child limits in v3
* Test new behaviour of v3 counts
* Rework v3 queue building to respect parent limits
* Add missing did field to SQL query
* Fix `LimitTreeMap::is_exhausted()`
* Rework tree building logic
https://github.com/ankitects/anki/pull/1638#discussion_r798328734
* Add timer for build_queues()
* `is_exhausted()` -> `limit_reached()`
* Move context and limits into `QueueBuilder`
This allows for moving more logic into QueueBuilder, so less passing
around of arguments. Unfortunately, some tests will require additional
work to set up.
* Fix stop condition in new_cards_by_position
* Fix order gather order of new cards by deck
* Add scheduler/queue/builder/burying.rs
* Fix bad tree due to unsorted child decks
* Fix comment
* Fix `cap_new_to_review_rec()`
* Add test for new card gathering
* Always sort `child_decks()`
* Fix deck removal in `cap_new_to_review_rec()`
* Fix sibling ordering in new card gathering
* Remove limits for deck total count with children
* Add random gather order
* Remove bad sibling order handling
All routines ensure ascending order now.
Also do some other minor refactoring.
* Remove queue truncating
All routines stop now as soon as the root limit is reached.
* Move deck fetching into `QueueBuilder::new()`
* Rework new card gather and sort options
https://github.com/ankitects/anki/pull/1638#issuecomment-1032173013
* Disable new sort order choices ...
depending on set gather order.
* Use enum instead of numbers
* Ensure valid sort order setting
* Update new gather and sort order tooltips
* Warn about random insertion order with v3
* Revert "Add timer for build_queues()"
This reverts commit c9f5fc6ebe.
* Update rslib/src/storage/card/mod.rs (dae)
* minor wording tweaks to the tooltips (dae)
+ move legacy strings to bottom
+ consistent capitalization (our leech action still needs fixing,
but that will require introducing a new 'suspend card' string as the
existing one is used elsewhere as well)
Context: https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/more-cards-today-question-about-v3/12400/10
Previously, interday learning cards and reviews were gathered at the
same time in v3, with the review limit being applied to both of them. The
order cards were gathered in would change the ratio of gathered learning
cards and reviews, but as they were displayed together in a single count,
a changing ratio was not apparent, and no special handling was required
by the deck tree code.
Showing interday learning cards in the learning count, while still
applying a review limit to them, makes things more complicated, as
a changing ratio will result in different counts. The deck tree code
is not able to know which order cards will appear in, so without changes,
we would have had a situation where the deck list may show different counts
to those seen when clicking on a deck.
One way to solve this would have been to introduce a separate limit for
interday learning cards. But this would have meant users needed to
juggle two different limits, instead of having a single one that controls
total number of (non-intraday) cards shown.
Instead, the scheduler now fetches interday cards prior to reviews -
the rationale for that order is that learning cards tend to be more
fragile/urgent than reviews. The option to show learning cards
before/after/mixed with reviews still exists, but it applies only after
cards have been capped to the daily limit.
To ensure the deck tree code matches the counts the scheduler gives,
it too applies limits to interday learning cards first, and reviews
afterwards.
Interday learning cards are now counted in the learning count again,
and are no longer subject to the daily review limit.
The thinking behind the original change was that interday learning cards
are scheduled more like reviews, and counting them in the review count
would allow the learning count to focus on intraday learning - the red
number reflecting the fact that they are the most fragile memories. And
counting them together made it practical to apply the review limit
to both at once.
Since the release, there have been a number of users expecting to see
interday learning cards included in the learning count (the latest being
https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/feedback-and-a-feature-adjustment-request-for-2-1-45/12308),
and a good argument can be made for that too - they are, after all, listed
in the learning steps, and do tend to be harder than reviews. Short of
introducing another count to keep track of interday and intraday learning
separately, moving back to the old behaviour seems like the best move.
This also means it is not really practical to apply the review limit to
interday learning cards anymore, as the limit would be split between two
different numbers, and how much each number is capped would depend on
the order cards are introduced. The scheduler could figure this out, but
the deck list code does not know card order, and would need significant
changes to be able to produce numbers that matched the scheduler. And
even if we ignore implementation complexities, I think it would be more
difficult for users to reason about - the influence of the review limit
on new cards is confusing enough as it is.
Instead of calling a method inside the transaction body, routines
can now pass Op::SkipUndo if they wish the changes to be discarded
at the end of the transaction. The advantage of doing it this way is
that the list of changes can still be returned, allowing the sync
indicator to update immediately.
Closes#1252
- Daily limits are no longer inherited - each deck limits its own
cards, and the selected deck enforces a maximum limit.
- Fetching of review cards now uses a single query, and sorts in advance.
In collections with a large number of overdue cards and decks, this is
faster than iterating over each deck in turn.
- Include interday learning count in review count & review limit, and
allow them to be buried.
- Warn when parent review limit is lower than child deck in deck options.
- Cap the new card limit to the review limit.
- Add option to control whether new card fetching short-circuits.
Updating a deck via protobuf is now exposed on the backend, but not
currently on the frontend - I suspect we'll be better off writing
separate routines for the actions we need instead, and we get a better
undo description for free.
This is currently causing an ugly redraw in the browse screen, which
will need fixing.
So, this is fun. Apparently "DeckId" is considered preferable to the
"DeckID" were were using until now, and the latest clippy will start
warning about it. We could of course disable the warning, but probably
better to bite the bullet and switch to the naming that's generally
considered best.
- fetch sfld and csum when fetching notes, to make it cheaper
to write them back out unmodified
- make `fields` private, and access it via accessors, so we can
still catch when fields have been mutated without calling
prepare_for_update()
- fix python importing code passing a string in as the checksum
- Rework V2 upgrade so that it no longer resets cards in learning,
or empties filtered decks.
- V1 users will receive a message at the top of the deck list
encouraging them to upgrade, and they can upgrade directly from that
screen.
- The setting in the preferences screen has been removed, so users
will need to use an older Anki version if they wish to switch back to
V1.
- Prevent V2 exports with scheduling from being importable into a V1
collection - the code was previously allowing this when it shouldn't
have been.
- New collections still default to v1 at the moment.
Also add helper to get map of decks and deck configs, as there were
a few places in the codebase where that was required.
- .update() should update a single deck and preserve usn by default,
as that's what existing code expects
- decks are automatically renamed when they conflict with an existing
name
- notes with wrong field count are now recovered instead of
being deleted
- notes with missing note types are now recovered
- notes with missing cards are now recovered
- recover_missing_deck() still needs implementing
- checks required
